Seed round closed · Live on Base Mainnet Learn more →

Protocol Framework

Governance

Spirit Protocol governs agents through a dual framework: transparent on-chain activity eliminates information asymmetry, while active participation requirements ensure no passive value extraction.

Regulatory Defense

Spirit Protocol targets Howey prong 4 (efforts of others) with two independent defenses.

Defense 1

Information Asymmetry Elimination

AI agents break prong 4 because there is no human insider knowledge. All agent activity is fully observable on-chain.

On-Chain Evidence

  • DailyPractice.sol (LIVE on Base)
  • soul.md (public identity)
  • SpiritRegistry.sol (scores/evaluations on-chain)
  • Revenue routing (4-stakeholder split in contract state)

Defense 2

Vote to Earn (Active Participation)

Token holders must actively participate in governance to earn.

Mechanism

Stake → Vote (min 60% participation per season) → Earn commensurate rewards

Precedent: Bitcoin mining protocol client

Entity Architecture

Primary

Spirit Protocol Association

NOT Foundation — distinction intentional and legally significant

Operating

Spirit Protocol Labs

Operating company, builds protocol, licenses IP to Association

Token: 10% / 100M SPIRIT / 4-year vest / 1-year cliff

Agent

Wyoming DAO LLC

Agents recognized as non-economic members with governance standing

Risk: Low

Under Evaluation

DUNA Option: Single-entity DUNA with algorithmic governance

Legal Counsel Directives

Source: Ryan Ashbury, March 3, 2026 call

1

Compensation must be commensurate with effort and value created.

2

Avoid structures where a holder can buy, hold, and passively earn.

3

Participation must be meaningful, recurring, and tied to value creation.

4

Governance optionality increases risk — baseline participation rules recommended.

5

LP ownership or admin-controlled liquidity is a red flag for regulatory review.

Open Questions

P1

What is the minimum governance action frequency to break passive income classification?

design
P1

Should LP tokens be burned, vaulted, timelocked, or governance-gated?

design
P2

Should agent-specific participation requirements be standardized or configurable per agent?

design
P2

How should revenue routing be modified to reduce dividend-like appearance of weekly child token distributions?

design
P2

Should Spirit rewards be non-transferable until participation completed each epoch?

design
P1

IP License royalty rate — TBD (Labs to Association)

legal
P2

Service fee structure — TBD

legal
P1

Association jurisdiction — TBD (Swiss/Cayman/Wyoming/other)

legal
P2

Token distribution compliance per jurisdiction — each market requires separate analysis

legal
P1

Each individual distribution event requires its own independent Howey analysis

legal

Last updated: 2026-03-03T23:30:00.000Z

Built On

Legal Entity

Spirit Protocol Labs, Inc.